SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5065

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
ANIL KUMAR SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY TAHSILDAR REVENUE RECOVERY OFFICE – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.B.J.JOHN PRAKASH, SHRI.P.PRAMEL, SHRI.SOORAJ M.S., SMT.VARSHA VIJAYAKUMAR NAIR, SHRI.MANU BABY, SMT.RAJASREE K.

J U D G M E N T

Today when the matter came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners sought the permission of this court to withdraw this writ petition without prejudice to their rights.

Permission granted. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, without prejudice to the statutory rights, if any, available to the petitioners.

Sd/-

ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.

JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top