Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5065

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
ANIL KUMAR SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY TAHSILDAR REVENUE RECOVERY OFFICE – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 38433 OF 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.B.J.JOHN PRAKASH, SHRI.P.PRAMEL, SHRI.SOORAJ M.S., SMT.VARSHA VIJAYAKUMAR NAIR, SHRI.MANU BABY, SMT.RAJASREE K.

Permission to withdraw a writ petition can be granted, preserving the petitioner's statutory rights.

Headnote:The court analyzed the rights of petitioners under the relevant statutory provisions, examining the background of the case, which involves withdrawal of a writ petition. The court found that the petitioners' request to dismiss the petition without prejudice was reasonable. The main issue addressed was whether permission for withdrawal could be granted, culminating in the decision to dismiss the writ as withdrawn while preserving statutory rights.

J U D G M E N T

Today when the matter came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners sought the permission of this court to withdraw this writ petition without prejudice to their rights.

Permission granted. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, without prejudice to the statutory rights, if any, available to the petitioners.

Sd/-

ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.

JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5065

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., JANIL KUMAR SHARMA – AppellantVersusDEPUTY TAHSILDAR REVENUE RECOVERY OFFICE – RespondentWP(C) NO. 38433 OF 2025

Permission to withdraw a writ petition can be granted, preserving the petitioner's statutory rights.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
ANIL KUMAR SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY TAHSILDAR REVENUE RECOVERY OFFICE – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 38433 OF 2025