SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5080

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
ELDHOSE K S – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 264 OF 2026 | CRIME NO.732/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.RAMEEZ NOOH, SMT.FATHIMA K., SHRI.DANIC ANTONY, SMT.KRISHNENDU K.V., SMT.JENNA SUSAN BAJI
For the Respondents: SRI.M.C. ASHI

The court granted pre-arrest bail considering lack of evidence linking the accused to the crime.

Headnote:This application is filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking pre-arrest bail for the applicant, accused No.2 in Crime No.732/2025. The prosecution alleges that on 05.12.2025, the applicant and others attempted to commit murder by wrongfully restraining the complainant. The Court found that there were no materials directly linking the applicant to the crime and ruled that custodial interrogation was unnecessary.

Result: The application is allowed under specific conditions to ensure cooperation with the investigation.

Table of Content
1. accused is charged with attempted murder and wrongful restraint. (Para 2 , 3)
2. arguments presented on innocence and necessity of bail. (Para 4 , 5)

ORDER

This application is filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, BNSS ), seeking pre-

arrest bail.

2. The applicant is the accused No.2 in Crime No.732/2025 of Elamakkara Police Station, Ernakulam District. The offences alleged are punishable under Section s 126 (2), 115(2), 109 read with Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 .

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the applicant herein along with other accused persons with an intention to commit murder of the defacto complainant on 05.12.2025 in between 11:00 p.m. and 11:45 p.m., wrongfully restrained him. The accused No.1 slapped on his left cheek, then stabbed on his chest using a knife and thereby committed the above offences.

4. I have heard Sri.Rameez Nooh, the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri.M.C.Ashi, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the above crime. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime; hence, he is entitled to bail. The learned Senior Public Prosecutor, on the other hand, submitted that the alleged incident occurred as part of the applicant's intentional criminal acts, and if he is released on bail at this stage, it will affect the course of the investigation. 6. I went through the FIS. The main allegation is against the accused No.1 who stabbed the defacto complainant and caused injuries. Admittedly, the applicant did not use any weapon. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. The recovery has been effected. Considering the allegations made against the applicant, his custodial interrogation seems unnecessary. For these reasons, I find this to be an appropriate case to grant pre-

arrest bail to the applicant.

In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions:-

(i) The applicant shall be released on bail in the event of his arrest on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/investigating officer, as the case may be.

(ii) The applicant shall fully cooperate with the investigation, including subjecting himself to the deemed police custody for discovery, if any, as and when demanded.

(iii) The applicant shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m. and 11.00 a.m. every Saturday until further orders. He shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required.

(iv) The applicant shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.

(v) The applicant shall not attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.

(vi) The applicant shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.

(vii) The application, if any, for deletion/modification of bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court.

Sd/-

DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH JUDGE

SKP

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top