SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5085

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
RAVEESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 423 OF 2026|S.C.NO.309 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.SHAJU M.S.
For the Respondents: SRI.M.C. ASHI, SR. PP

Bail application dismissed due to serious allegations and prior criminal involvement of the applicant.

Headnote:This judgment pertains to a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The petitioner, arrayed as Accused No. 2 in S.C. No. 309/2025, seeks bail for alleged offences under the NDPS Act. The Court finds serious allegations against the applicant, emphasizing involvement in premeditated criminal acts and prior absconding, leading to dismissal of the bail application.

Table of Content
1. application for bail under specific provisions. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments presented by both sides regarding bail. (Para 4)
3. court's assessment of the applicant's involvement and implications. (Para 5)

ORDER

This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short, BNSS )

seeking regular bail.

2. The applicant is arrayed as accused No.2 in S.C.No.309/2025 on the files of the Additional District and Sessions Court, Kalpetta in Crime No.68/2025 of Thirunelli Police Station, Wayanad District. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 22 (c) and 29(1) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act , 1985 (for short, the NDPS Act)

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on

1.2.2025, the officers of Thirunelli police while on patrol duty, found the accused Nos.1 to 4 in possession of 32.78 gms of MDMA from the dash board of the car in contravention of the NDPS Act and Rules.

4. I have heard Sri. M.S. Shaju, the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri. M.C. Ashi, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime; hence, he is entitled to bail. On the other hand, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor submitted that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the applicant, and he is not entitled to bail at this stage.

The applicant was formally arrested on 28.4.2025. A perusal of the case diary would reveal that the accusation against the applicant is very serious, and it prima facie shows a premeditated criminal act on his part. He was granted bail by this Court for ten days to perform his own marriage on 16.6.2025. However, he absconded and he was arrested after five months on 27.11.2025. Since then he is in custody. That apart, he is involved in four other crimes of similar nature. Considering the nature of the crime, the gravity of the offence, the complicity of the applicant in it, and the facts and circumstances mentioned above, I am of the view that the applicant cannot be released on bail at this stage. The bail application, accordingly, is dismissed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top