Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5104

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
JOHN LIVINGSTON – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 19679 OF 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.AJIT G ANJARLEKAR, SRI.G.P.SHINOD, SRI.GOVIND PADMANAABHAN, SHRI.ATUL MATHEWS, SMT.GAYATHRI S.B.
For the Respondents: SMT.K.P.SANTHI, SMT. AMMINIKUTTY K., SR. GP

Petitioners are permitted to withdraw a writ petition with liberty to file a fresh one.

Headnote:The court analyzed the writ petition under WP

(C) NO. 19679 OF 2025, wherein the petitioners sought permission to withdraw with liberty to file a fresh petition. The court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the petition accordingly. The key issue framed revolved around the procedural liberty to re-file. The final decision of the court was to dismiss the writ petition as withdrawn.

JUDGMENT

The learned Counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file a fresh one.

Permission is granted. Reserving the aforesaid liberty, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS,JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5104

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMBECHU KURIAN THOMAS, JJOHN LIVINGSTON – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentWP(C) NO. 19679 OF 2025

Petitioners are permitted to withdraw a writ petition with liberty to file a fresh one.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
JOHN LIVINGSTON – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 19679 OF 2025