SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5105

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
MUNNAKKAL BAVA SALIM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 45999 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.P.T.SHEEJISH
For the Respondents: SMT. AMMINIKUTTY K.

Litigants have the discretion to withdraw a petition, resulting in dismissal if pursued non-pressingly.

Headnote:The petitioners submitted they do not wish to pursue the writ petition under WP

(C) No. 45999 of 2025. The court observed their request and dismissed the case as not pressed. The dismissal reflects the petitioners’ choice not to continue with the litigation.

JUDGMENT

The learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners do not intend to pursue the writ petition.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as not pressed.

sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top