Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
SHEEBA NAVAS – Appellant
Versus
MATHEW PHILIP – Respondent
ORDER
Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the material defects that have occurred in the Crl.M.C, he may be permitted to withdraw the Crl.M.C, without prejudice to the right to file a fresh Crl.M.C on the same cause of action.
Recording the above submission, the petitioner is granted liberty to file a fresh Crl.M.C on the same cause of action. Consequently, the Crl.M.C is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
