Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5123

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
AMBILI K – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 1205 OF 2022

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Shri.Domson J.Vattakuzhy
For the Respondents: Sri.M.P.Prasanth, PP

The court affirmed the procedural validity of withdrawing a criminal miscellaneous case upon the petitioners' request.

Headnote:This judgment addresses the withdrawal of a Criminal Miscellaneous Case under the applicable criminal law. The petitioners, represented by counsel, submitted a request for dismissal, which the Court acknowledged and acted upon. The court ruled that the case was dismissed as withdrawn, concluding the matter without further adjudication.

ORDER

Dated this the 29^th day of January, 2026 The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the Crl.M.C may be dismissed as withdrawn.

Recording the above submission, the Crl.M.C is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5123

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMC.S.DIAS, JAMBILI K – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentCRL.MC NO. 1205 OF 2022

The court affirmed the procedural validity of withdrawing a criminal miscellaneous case upon the petitioners' request.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
AMBILI K – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 1205 OF 2022