Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5124

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
SHAMSUDHEEN K.M – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 1229 OF 2022

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI. SAYED MANSOOR BAFAKHY THANGAL, SHRI.SHIBU JOSEPH, SRI.AJITH VISWANATHAN, SRI.JEFFIN JOHN
For the Respondents: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The court upheld the dismissal of a criminal miscellaneous case when the petitioner chose not to pursue it.

Headnote:The judgment pertains to Crl.M.C No. 1229 of 2022 involving the petitioner and state. The petitioner sought dismissal of the case as not pressed. The court determined there was no need for further proceedings at this stage. The matter concluded as the petitioner opted not to pursue the motion. In fine, the court dismissed the petition.

O R D E R Dated this the 29^th day of January, 2026 The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Crl. M.C. may be dismissed as not pressed.

Recording the above submission, the Crl.M.C is dismissed as not pressed.

SD/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5124

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMC.S.DIAS, JSHAMSUDHEEN K.M – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentCRL.MC NO. 1229 OF 2022

The court upheld the dismissal of a criminal miscellaneous case when the petitioner chose not to pursue it.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
SHAMSUDHEEN K.M – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 1229 OF 2022