SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5139

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
DHYAN S. – Appellant
Versus
THE SECRETARY, THRIKKOVILVATTTOM PANCHAYAT SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.B.KRISHNA MANI, SMT.N.V.SANDHYA, SMT.DHANUJA M.S
For the Respondents: SHRI.K.S.MANU, SRI SUNIL NATH, GP

J U D G M E N T

I have heard Sri. Krishnan Mani, the learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri. K.S. Manu for the respondent –

Bank.

2. It is stated by the learned counsel for the respondent – Bank, on the basis of the instructions received by him, that the petitioner has cleared the entire loan amount.

In view of the above, nothing further remains for consideration, and accordingly, the writ petition would stand closed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top