Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5141

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
M/S.DUROLAC – Appellant
Versus
SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER (PWD), BUILDING DIVISION, ERNAKULAM – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 10937 OF 2023

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.S.SUJIN, SMT.KEERTHI M., SHRI.B.BILWIN, SMT.T.N.GIRIJA, SMT.NITA.N.S.
For the Respondents: SRI SUNIL NATH

A case dismissed as infructuous indicates lack of viable claims warranting judicial intervention.

Headnote:In WP

(C) NO. 10937 OF 2023, the High Court of Kerala found the petitioner’s case become infructuous, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition accordingly. The petitioner had presented multiple letters and representations, which were unnecessary given the matter's status. The court concluded that there was no basis for the continuation of claims.

J U D G M E N T

The learned Counsel for the petitioner states that the matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

HARISANKAR V. MENON JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5141

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMHARISANKAR V. MENON, JM/S.DUROLAC – AppellantVersusSUPERINTENDING ENGINEER (PWD), BUILDING DIVISION, ERNAKULAM – RespondentWP(C) NO. 10937 OF 2023

A case dismissed as infructuous indicates lack of viable claims warranting judicial intervention.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
M/S.DUROLAC – Appellant
Versus
SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER (PWD), BUILDING DIVISION, ERNAKULAM – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 10937 OF 2023