Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5143

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
SHIJU PADINHARE VEETIL, ARUNDHATI SUKHTANKAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 14340 OF 2023

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.S.KARTHIKA, SMT.ANJANA M VADHYAR
For the Respondents: SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI, SMT SYLAJA.S.L, GP

The court permitted the withdrawal of a writ petition, reflecting on the procedures and regulations concerning surrogacy.

Headnote:In this judgment, the Court examined the petitioners' request to withdraw WP

(C) No. 14340 of 2023. The statutory framework under the Surrogacy Regulation Act, 2021 was considered, alongside relevant orders and medical certifications related to surrogacy claims. The court ultimately found in favor of the withdrawal of the writ petition as not pressed, resulting in its dismissal as withdrawn.

J U D G M E N T

The learned Counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition as not pressed.

Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

HARISANKAR V. MENON JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5143

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMHARISANKAR V. MENON, JSHIJU PADINHARE VEETIL, ARUNDHATI SUKHTANKAR – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentWP(C) NO. 14340 OF 2023

The court permitted the withdrawal of a writ petition, reflecting on the procedures and regulations concerning surrogacy.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
SHIJU PADINHARE VEETIL, ARUNDHATI SUKHTANKAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 14340 OF 2023