SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5155

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
RAMESH BABU A. – Appellant
Versus
REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SAJEEV KUMAR K.GOPAL
For the Respondents: SMT. DEVI SHRI R., SRI.SAJU J. VALLYARA

JUDGMENT

The writ petition is filed with the following prayers:-

I. issue a writ of Mandamus or other appropriate writs, directions or orders directing the respondents 1 and 2 to consider and pass orders Exhibit P-3 representation submitted by the petitioner so as to correct the mistake happened while granting regular permit to the 3rd respondent in violation to the one way system from Kunnumpuram-V.K. Pady before implementing Exhibit P-2 decision;

II. To dispense with the production of English Translation of documents which are in vernacular language;

III. Render such other orders as are deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

2. On the question of the grant of a permit to the 3rd respondent, the petitioner herein need not be heard, more so when no final decision has been taken by the authority concerned. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the grant of the permit, it will be open to the petitioner to avail the statutory remedy on available grounds.

Subject to the above, the writ petition is dismissed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top