Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5161

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
JOSE THARAKAN – Appellant
Versus
RAJEENA S – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 231 OF 2026 | WP(C) NO.6760 OF 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.MUHASIN K.M., SMT.FARHANA K.H.
For the Respondents: SR GP, SMT VIDYA KURIAKOSE

Compliance with court directions negates contempt charges.

Headnote:In this Contempt of Court case, the court analyzed whether the prior directions in WP

(C) No.6760/2025 were complied with. The learned Government Pleader indicated compliance, leading to the conclusion that no contempt had occurred. The court thus closed the case, emphasizing compliance with its earlier orders.

JUDGMENT

When this Contempt of Court case came up for consideration, the learned Government Pleader submitted that the directions as per the judgment dated 20.02.2025 in WP(C) No.6760/2025 are already complied with. If that be the case, there is no contempt in this case. Hence, the contempt case can be closed.

Recording the submission of the learned Government Pleader, this Contempt of Court Case is closed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5161

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMP.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, JJOSE THARAKAN – AppellantVersusRAJEENA S – RespondentCON.CASE(C) NO. 231 OF 2026 | WP(C) NO.6760 OF 2025

Compliance with court directions negates contempt charges.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
JOSE THARAKAN – Appellant
Versus
RAJEENA S – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 231 OF 2026 | WP(C) NO.6760 OF 2025