Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5162

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
NASEERA – Appellant
Versus
S GAUTHAM RAJ, IAS – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 232 OF 2026 | WP(C) NO.6949 OF 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.MUHASIN K.M., SMT.FARHANA K.H.
For the Respondents: SMT DEEPA V

The absence of contempt is established when required procedural documents are returned for correction and the matter can be revisited if future delays arise.

Headnote:The judgment addresses the contempt proceedings concerning the petitioners, wherein the learned Government Pleader informed that the Form-6 application by the petitioners was returned for uploading a sketch, indicating no contempt. The court observed that the petitioners can reopen proceedings if delays persist, leading to a closure of the case.

JUDGMENT

When this Contempt of Court case came up for consideration, the learned Government Pleader submitted that the Form-6 application submitted by the petitioners is returned to the petitioners for uploading the sketch. If that be the case, there is no contempt in this case. The petitioners are free to do the needful and if there is any further delay, the petitioners can reopen the contempt case.

With the above observation, this Contempt of Court Case is closed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5162

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMP.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, JNASEERA – AppellantVersusS GAUTHAM RAJ, IAS – RespondentCON.CASE(C) NO. 232 OF 2026 | WP(C) NO.6949 OF 2025

The absence of contempt is established when required procedural documents are returned for correction and the matter can be revisited if future delays arise.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
NASEERA – Appellant
Versus
S GAUTHAM RAJ, IAS – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 232 OF 2026 | WP(C) NO.6949 OF 2025