SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5162

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
NASEERA – Appellant
Versus
S GAUTHAM RAJ, IAS – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.MUHASIN K.M., SMT.FARHANA K.H.
For the Respondents: SMT DEEPA V

JUDGMENT

When this Contempt of Court case came up for consideration, the learned Government Pleader submitted that the Form-6 application submitted by the petitioners is returned to the petitioners for uploading the sketch. If that be the case, there is no contempt in this case. The petitioners are free to do the needful and if there is any further delay, the petitioners can reopen the contempt case.

With the above observation, this Contempt of Court Case is closed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top