Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5165

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SULAL S.B – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 257 OF 2026 | WP(C) NO.14647 OF 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.KAVERY S THAMPI
For the Respondents: SR GP, SMT VIDYA KURIAKOSE

A petitioner may withdraw a contempt case with liberty to file a fresh one, which the court may grant.

Headnote:The petitioner's counsel seeks permission to withdraw the contempt case with liberty to file a fresh one. The court grants this request, dismissing the current case as withdrawn. This decision allows the petitioner to potentially initiate a new contempt proceeding. The dismissal serves as an acknowledgment of the petitioner’s request, thus facilitating future legal actions.

JUDGMENT

When this Contempt of Court case came up for consideration, the counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this Contempt Case with liberty to file a fresh one. Liberty is granted.

Therefore, this Contempt of Court Case is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5165

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMP.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, JSULAL S.B – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentCON.CASE(C) NO. 257 OF 2026 | WP(C) NO.14647 OF 2025

A petitioner may withdraw a contempt case with liberty to file a fresh one, which the court may grant.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SULAL S.B – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 257 OF 2026 | WP(C) NO.14647 OF 2025