IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
JOHNY – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 2071 OF 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. seeking relief through writ petition for timely processing of an application. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. counsel emphasizes the need for direction to expedite consideration. (Para 3) |
| 3. court directs timely report submission and decision on application. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:
“(i) Issue a writ of Mandamus or other appropriate Writ, Orders or directions, commanding the 2nd respondent to consider Ext.P-9 application in Form 5 and pass appropriate orders thereon after conducting a site inspection in view of Ext.P-8 judgment Basil Vs Local Level Monitoring Committee [2024 (1) KHC 28] within the statutory period or within a time frame as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit, proper and just, in the interest of Justice;
(ii) To dispense with the production of English Translation of Malayalam Exhibits produced along with the Writ Petition in the interest of justice;
(iii) Render such other orders or directions as this Hon’ble Court may deem just, fit and necessary in the facts and circumstances of the case.” [SIC]
2. When this Writ Petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Ext.P9 Form–5 application within a time frame.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P9 Form-5 application within a time frame.
Therefore, this Writ Petition(C) is disposed of in the following manner:
1. The 3rd respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on Ext.P9 Form-5 application to the 2nd respondent / Authorised Officer, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.
2. The 2nd respondent / Authorised O directed to consider Ext.P9 Form-5 application (if it is pending and if it is in order) based on the report received from the 3rd respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of the report.
3. The petitioner will produce a certified copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this Writ Petition with exhibits, before the 2nd and 3rd respondents for compliance.
Sd/-
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, JUDGE nvj
APPENDIX OF WP(C) NO. 2071 OF 2026 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P-1 TRUE COPY OF THE DOCUMENT NO.
Judgment reserved
NA
Date of judgment
29.01.2026
Judgment dictated
29.01.2026
Draft Judgment Placed
29.01.2026
Final Judgment Uploaded
30.01.2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.