IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
MR. JOSEPH J VAYALAT – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 2636 OF 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks mandamus for timely processing of land application. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court emphasizes expediency in processing government applications. (Para 3) |
| 3. court issues directives with specified timelines for action. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:
“(i) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction directing the 2nd respondent to consider Exhibit P3 application in accordance with law, within such time frame as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit;
(ii) Declare that the property having a total extent of 21.6 Ares, described in Exhibit P1, is not paddy land;
(iii) Grant such other and further reliefs as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.
(iv) Pass an order dispensing with the translation of the documents produced along with the Writ Petition in vernacular language.”
[SIC]
2. When this Writ Petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Ext. P3 Form–7 application within a time frame.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P3 application within a time frame.
Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:
1. The 3rd and Addl. 4th respondents are directed to submit the necessary reports based on Ext.P3 Form-7 application to the 2nd respondent / Authorised O expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.
2. The 2nd respondent / Authorised O directed to consider Ext.P3 Form-7 application (if it is pending and if it is in order) based on the reports received from the 3rd and Addl. 4th respondents, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of the reports.
3. The petitioner will produce a certified copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this Writ Petition with exhibits, before the 2nd, 3rd and Addl. 4th respondents for compliance.
Sd/-
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, JUDGE nvj
APPENDIX OF WP(C) NO. 2636 OF 2026 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT FOR THE YEAR 2025-2026 DATED 10-04- 2025, ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, MARADU Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C)
Judgment reserved
NA
Date of judgment
29.01.2026
Judgment dictated
29.01.2026
Draft Judgment Placed
30.01.2026
Final Judgment Uploaded
30.01.2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.