IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SUNIL KUMAR.T.K – Appellant
Versus
STATE ELECTION COMMISSION – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed with following prayers :
i) “To declare that vote cast by the petitioner in the election dated 27.12.2025 to the post of President in the third respondent Panchayat (Munderi Grama Panchayat)
is valid;
ii) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ or direction commanding the second respondent to declare the result of the election to the post of President of the third respondent Panchayat held on 27.12.2025 by treating the vote cast by the petitioner as valid;
iii) To pass an order to dispense with production of English translation exhibits in vernacular language.
iv) To grant such other reliefs as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts circumstance of the case; .” [sic]
2. The petitioner challenged the rejection of petitioner's vote in the President Election of 3rd respondent- Panchayat. I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition for the simple reason that the petitioner has got an alternative remedy as per Sec. 153 (14) of the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act . Therefore, I do not want to make any observation about the merit of the case. All the contentions raised by the petitioner in this writ petition are left open. The pe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.