IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
DAISY PETER – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
“i. To pass a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the 2nd and 3rd respondents herein to consider Exhibit P6 Form 5 application by conducting proper site inspection within a time frame as may be decided by this Honourable Court.
ii. Issue any other appropriate writ, order or direction as the case may be as this Honourable Court deems fit and necessary in the interest of justice.
Iii. Pleased to dispense with English translation of the documents produced herewith.
iv. Award costs to the petitioners.”
[SIC]
2. When this Writ Petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Ext. P6 Form – 5 application within a time frame.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P6 application within a time frame.
Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:
1. The 5th respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on the E
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.