IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
DAISY PETER – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 3079 OF 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's request for timely consideration. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. counsel's agreement on the need for direction. (Para 3) |
| 3. court emphasizes action within time frame. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
“i. To pass a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the 2nd and 3rd respondents herein to consider Exhibit P6 Form 5 application by conducting proper site inspection within a time frame as may be decided by this Honourable Court.
ii. Issue any other appropriate writ, order or direction as the case may be as this Honourable Court deems fit and necessary in the interest of justice.
Iii. Pleased to dispense with English translation of the documents produced herewith.
iv. Award costs to the petitioners.”
[SIC]
2. When this Writ Petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Ext. P6 Form – 5 application within a time frame.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P6 application within a time frame.
Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:
1. The 5th respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on the Ext. P6 application to the 3rd respondent/Authorised O expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.
2. The 3rd respondent/Authorised O consider Ext. P6 application (if it is pending and if it is in order) based on the report received from the 5th respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the report.
3. The petitioner will produce a certified copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this Writ Petition with exhibits, before the 3rd and 5th respondents for compliance.
Sd/-
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE GBG
PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit-P1 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE SALE DEED NO.
Judgment reserved
NA
Date of judgment
29.01.2026
Judgment dictated
29.01.2026
Draft Judgment Placed
29.01.2026
Final Judgment Uploaded
30.01.2026
4960/2005 OF S.R.O; ALANGAD DATED
29.08.2005.
Exhibit-P2 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT DATED 11.08.2025 ISSUED FROM THE VILLAGE OFFICE ALANGAD.
Exhibit-P3 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE EXTRACT FROM THE DATE BANK PUBLISHED ON 24.03.2012 IN KERALA EXTRA ORDINARY GAZETTE SHOWING LAND IDENTIFICATION DETAILS.
Exhibit-P4 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE DEATH CERTIFICATE OF DECEASED HUSBAND OF THE PETITIONER HEREIN DATED 07.02.2025 ISSUED FROM THE ARPOOKARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH.
Exhibit-P5 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE LEGAL HEIRS CERTIFICATE OF THE DECEASED HUSBAND OF THE PETITIONER HEREIN DATED 18.09.2025 ISSUED FROM THE KANAYANNOOR TALUK OFFICE.
Exhibit-P6 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE APPLICATION IN FORM
5 OF THE Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Rules, 2008 DATED 31.10.2025 SUBMITTED THROUGH THE JOSE BIJU, THE ELDER SON OF THE BY THE PETITIONER HEREIN.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.