IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
JYOTHILAKSHMI A – Appellant
Versus
REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
“i) Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, direction or order directing the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P1 thereon within a time frame fixed by this Hon’ble Court;
ii) To dispense with filing of translation of vernacular documents in the interest of justice.
Iii) Grant such other reliefs as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit to grant in the facts and circumstances of the case.”
[SIC]
2. The main prayer in this Writ Petition is to consider Ext.P1 Form - 6 application filed by the petitioner under Section 27A read with Rule 12(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act and Rules, 2008 ('Act and Rules' in short).
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P1 within a time frame.
Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:
1. The 2nd respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on the Ext. P1 application to the 1st respondent/Authorised O of one month from the date of receipt of a certifie
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.