IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
DEVASSI JOSEPH – Appellant
Versus
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER MUVATTUPUZHA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 3436 OF 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition seeks mandamus for application processing. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court hears parties for directive compliance. (Para 3) |
| 3. the court provides timelines for administrative action. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:
“(i) Issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction directing the 1st Respondent or the Authorized officer under Section 2(xvA) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008 to consider and pass orders on Exhibit P4 Application in accordance with law within the shortest time period as possible.
(ii) To dispense with filing of the translation of Vernacular Documents.
(iii) Allow the Writ petition with costs.
(iv) Grant such other further reliefs which this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to direct in the facts and circumstances of the case.” [SIC]
2. The main prayer in this Writ Petition is to consider Ext.P4 Form-6 application filed by the petitioner under Section 27A read with Rule 12(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act and Rules, 2008 ('Act and Rules' in short).
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P4 within a time frame.
Therefore, this Writ Petition(C) is disposed of in the following manner:
1. The 3rd respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on Ext.P4 Form-6 application to the 2nd respondent / Authorised Officer within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.
2. The 2nd respondent / Authorised O directed to consider Ext.P4 Form-6 application (if it is pending and if it is in order) based on the report received from the 3rd respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of the report. I make it clear that the 2nd respondent is free to pass appropriate orders in accordance with the law.
3. The petitioner will produce a certified copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this Writ Petition with exhibits, before the 2nd and 3rd respondents for compliance.
Sd/-
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, JUDGE nvj
APPENDIX OF WP(C) NO. 3436 OF 2026 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit- P1 TRUE COPY OF THE BASIC TAX RECEIPT DATED 21-04-2025 ISSUED BY 3RD RESPONDENT.
Judgment reserved
NA
Date of judgment
29.01.2026
Judgment dictated
29.01.2026
Draft Judgment Placed
29.01.2026
Final Judgment Uploaded
30 .01.2026
Exhibit- P2 TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.