Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
BUSHARA BEEVI K T – Appellant
Versus
ALAPPUZHA MUNICIPALITY – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to municipality notices regarding unauthorized construction. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court heard arguments from both sides. (Para 3) |
| 3. court's review of the order issued under the municipality act. (Para 5) |
JUDGMENT
This Writ Petition (C) is filed seeking the following reliefs:
" i. To Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing Exhibits P6 and P7 notices issued by the 2nd respondent.
ii. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction restraining the respondents from demolishing the petitioner’s building or taking any coercive action pursuant to Exhibits P6 and P7. "
[SIC]
2. Alleging that there is unauthorised construction on the side of the petitioner, a provisional order was passed, and the same was confirmed by the Municipal Authority. Thereafter, it seems that the petitioner demolished a portion of unauthorised construction. Thereafter, the Municipality again issued proceedings as directed by the Ombudsman. Even now, unauthorised construction is not removed and therefore, Ext.P7 is issued by the Municipality. Aggrieved by the same, this writ petition is filed.
3. Heard counsel for the petitione
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
