IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
BUSHARA BEEVI K T – Appellant
Versus
ALAPPUZHA MUNICIPALITY – Respondent
JUDGMENT
This Writ Petition (C) is filed seeking the following reliefs:
" i. To Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing Exhibits P6 and P7 notices issued by the 2nd respondent.
ii. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction restraining the respondents from demolishing the petitioner’s building or taking any coercive action pursuant to Exhibits P6 and P7. "
[SIC]
2. Alleging that there is unauthorised construction on the side of the petitioner, a provisional order was passed, and the same was confirmed by the Municipal Authority. Thereafter, it seems that the petitioner demolished a portion of unauthorised construction. Thereafter, the Municipality again issued proceedings as directed by the Ombudsman. Even now, unauthorised construction is not removed and therefore, Ext.P7 is issued by the Municipality. Aggrieved by the same, this writ petition is filed.
3. Heard counsel for the petitioner and the Standing Counsel appearing for the Municipality. I also heard the counsel appearing for the 3rd respondent.
4. When this case came up for consideration on
28.11.2025, this Court passed the following order:
" Issue notic
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.