IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R.RAVI, J
T.P.NOUFAL – Appellant
Versus
T.K.NANU – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The challenge in the original petition is against Ext.P6 order whereby the execution court has found that the judgment debtor has sufficient means and directed to issue warrant.
2. The original petition has been pending before this Court for the past more than one year and no purpose will be served by retaining it any further. A reading of Ext.P6 would show that it is a non-speaking order and no reasons have been stated despite the fact that evidence was adduced.
3. In the above circumstances, this original petition is allowed. Ext.P6 order is set aside. The court below is directed to reconsider the issue based on the evidence which had already been adduced and pass a reasoned order.
sd/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.