SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5194

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R.RAVI, J
T.P.NOUFAL – Appellant
Versus
T.K.NANU – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.SATHEESHAN ALAKKADAN
For the Respondents: SRI.R.SURENDRAN

JUDGMENT

The challenge in the original petition is against Ext.P6 order whereby the execution court has found that the judgment debtor has sufficient means and directed to issue warrant.

2. The original petition has been pending before this Court for the past more than one year and no purpose will be served by retaining it any further. A reading of Ext.P6 would show that it is a non-speaking order and no reasons have been stated despite the fact that evidence was adduced.

3. In the above circumstances, this original petition is allowed. Ext.P6 order is set aside. The court below is directed to reconsider the issue based on the evidence which had already been adduced and pass a reasoned order.

sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top