SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5196

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
BABY UTHUPU – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.BINU PAUL
For the Respondents: GP- RIYAL DEVASSY

JUDGMENT

The petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction to the 2nd respondent – the Taluk Land Board, Kunnathunadu Taluk, to act in terms of Ext.P2 judgment.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the additional 6th respondent submits that the brother of the petitioner is a member of the 2nd respondent and therefore, no direction may be issued to the 2nd respondent to decide the matter, since it is not proper for the said authority to adjudicate the matter. Thereupon the petitioner would submit that he has preferred Ext.P5 application before the 2nd respondent, seeking to transfer the proceedings in Ceiling Case No.L6 SR No.429/73/KND to Aluva Taluk Land Board, in view of the objection now made.

3. The learned Government Pleader submits that a decision regarding transferring of a case from one Taluk Board to another, cannot be taken by the 2nd respondent, and that the State Land Board, the additional 7th respondent herein, is the proper authority to do so.

4. Therefore, the above writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:

1. The 2nd respondent shall transmit Ext.P5 to the additional 7th respondent, within a period of one month from the date receipt of a cop

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top