Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5210

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BASANT BALAJI, J
JOGESH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 8672 OF 2020

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.K.C.SANTHOSHKUMAR, SMT.K.K.CHANDRALEKHA, SMT.ANUPAMA JOHNY, SMT.P.MAYA, SMT.K.S.SUDHA
For the Respondents: SHRI.M.SASINDRAN

The court determined that a writ petition becomes moot when the issues presented are resolved, leading to its closure.

Headnote:The judgment addresses WP

(C) No. 8672 of 2020, where the Petitioner contended that they had closed the outstanding loan account. After confirming this with the applicant's counsel, the Court concludes that no further issues remain. The Court's determination was to dismiss the petition as it was rendered moot. The final direction is that the writ petition stands closed.

JUDGMENT

(Dated this the 28^th day of January, 2026)

When the matter is taken up for consideration today, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the entire outstanding amount has been remitted and the loan account has been closed.

In view of the above, nothing survives for consideration in the writ petition, and the same stands closed.

SD/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5210

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMBASANT BALAJI, JJOGESH – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentWP(C) NO. 8672 OF 2020

The court determined that a writ petition becomes moot when the issues presented are resolved, leading to its closure.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BASANT BALAJI, J
JOGESH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 8672 OF 2020