SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5214

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
SUNITHA BABU JOSEPH – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE POLICE CHIEF – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.C.R.SIVAKUMAR, SMT.ANJALI C., SMT.BINI KRISHNA
For the Respondents: ADV. AMMINIKUTTY.K., SR. GP

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the 1st petitioner is not presently in India. It is also admitted that the 5th respondent, from whom the petitioners apprehend threat, is also not in India. In view of the above, there is no existing threat as alleged in the writ petition.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioners sought permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to approach this Court as and when the need arises.

Reserving the aforesaid liberty, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top