SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5215

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
DR. BALACHANDRAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: P.V.JEEVESH
For the Respondents: AKHIL K.MADHAV, DAISY S., C SEENA (PP)

O R D E R

(Dated this the 28th day of January, 2026)

Today, when the matter came up for arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioners was absent and there was no representation. During the previous posting date also, there was no representation for the petitioners.

Therefore, this Crl.M.C is dismissed for non prosecution.

Sd/-

C. PRATHEEP KUMAR JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top