Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5215

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
DR. BALACHANDRAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 2684 OF 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: P.V.JEEVESH
For the Respondents: AKHIL K.MADHAV, DAISY S., C SEENA (PP)

Non-prosecution leads to dismissal of the petition when petitioners fail to represent.

Headnote:This case involves a Criminal Miscellaneous Case filed by the petitioners against the order from the Judicial Magistrate regarding domestic violence. The court found the petitioners absent for representation on two occasions, leading to the dismissal of the petition for non-prosecution. The court stated, 'This Crl.M.C is dismissed for non prosecution.'

O R D E R

(Dated this the 28th day of January, 2026)

Today, when the matter came up for arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioners was absent and there was no representation. During the previous posting date also, there was no representation for the petitioners.

Therefore, this Crl.M.C is dismissed for non prosecution.

Sd/-

C. PRATHEEP KUMAR JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5215

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMC.PRATHEEP KUMAR, JDR. BALACHANDRAN – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentCRL.MC NO. 2684 OF 2025

Non-prosecution leads to dismissal of the petition when petitioners fail to represent.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
DR. BALACHANDRAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 2684 OF 2025