SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5222

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
AKHILJITH – Appellant
Versus
MAHESH KUMAR – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: G.PRIYADARSAN THAMPI
For the Respondents: BHAVANA VELAYUDHAN

C.S.DIAS, J.

------------------------------------------

Crl.M.C. No. 329 OF 2026 --------------------------------------------

Dated this the 28th day of January, 2026 ORDER The petitioners are the accused 1 to 3 in Crime No.917/2025, registered by the Mannanchery Police Station, Alappuzha, alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 126 (2), 117(2) and 115(2) read with Section 3 (5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023.

2. The petitioners have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Surksha Sanhita , to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioners and the respondents 1 and 2, who have executed Annexures A2 and A3 affidavits, affirming the settlement.

3. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners, the learned Public Prosecutor, and the learned Counsel for the respondents 1 and 2.

4. The learned counsel on either side submits that, with the intervention of relatives and well-wishers, the parties have resolved their disputes amicably. The respondents 1 and 2 have no su

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top