SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5226

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
ADV. PAREEDKUTTYMETHAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.B.PRAMOD, SHRI.BIJU VIGNESWAR, SHRI. AYYAPPADAS V

ORDER

The petitioner is the 4th accused in C.C.No.113/2023 on the file of the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Alappuzha, (Trial Court) which has originated from Crime No.382/2013, registered by the Alappuzha South Police Station, alleging that the accused persons have committed the offences punishable under Sections 468, 471 and 417 r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. The concise case of the prosecution is that, the accused 1 to 5 had forged a consent letter (Annexure A2) of the 2nd respondent and produced the same before the Alappuzha Municipality for getting building permit to construct a shed in the property of the accused 1 to 3. The specific allegations against the petitioner (4th accused) is that, he as a Notary Public had attested the consent letter affirming the signature of the 2nd respondent. Thus, the accused persons have committed the above offences.

3. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor. Although, service of notice is completed on the 2nd respondent, there is no appearance for him.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, in view of Section 13 of the Notaries Act, 1952 , (in short,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top