IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
ADV. PAREEDKUTTYMETHAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
ORDER
The petitioner is the 4th accused in C.C.No.113/2023 on the file of the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Alappuzha, (Trial Court) which has originated from Crime No.382/2013, registered by the Alappuzha South Police Station, alleging that the accused persons have committed the offences punishable under Sections 468, 471 and 417 r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
2. The concise case of the prosecution is that, the accused 1 to 5 had forged a consent letter (Annexure A2) of the 2nd respondent and produced the same before the Alappuzha Municipality for getting building permit to construct a shed in the property of the accused 1 to 3. The specific allegations against the petitioner (4th accused) is that, he as a Notary Public had attested the consent letter affirming the signature of the 2nd respondent. Thus, the accused persons have committed the above offences.
3. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor. Although, service of notice is completed on the 2nd respondent, there is no appearance for him.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, in view of Section 13 of the Notaries Act, 1952 , (in short,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.