Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
ADV. PAREEDKUTTYMETHAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. prosecution is based on a forged consent letter. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. the need for a complaint from government authorities is emphasized. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. judicial interpretation under section 13 safeguards notaries. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
ORDER
The petitioner is the 4th accused in C.C.No.113/2023 on the file of the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Alappuzha, (Trial Court) which has originated from Crime No.382/2013, registered by the Alappuzha South Police Station, alleging that the accused persons have committed the offences punishable under Sections 468, 471 and 417 r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
2. The concise case of the prosecution is that, the accused 1 to 5 had forged a consent letter (Annexure A2) of the 2nd respondent and produced the same before the Alappuzha Municipality for getting building permit to construct a shed in the property of the accused 1 to 3. The specific allegations against the petitioner (4th accused) is that, he as a Notary Public had attested the consent letter affirming the signature of the 2nd respondent. Thus, the accused persons have committed the above offences.
3. I have heard the learned counsel for the petiti
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
