Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
PRAVEEN.T.S. – Appellant
Versus
DASAN.P.K. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. context of review petition due to error regarding pending matters. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments raised by the review petitioner and counsel. (Para 3) |
| 3. court's observations on the necessity of judgment review. (Para 4) |
| 4. the court's decision to recall the prior judgment. (Para 5) |
ORDER
Dated this the 28th day of January, 2026 The review petitioner is the 11th respondent in W.P(C).No.43334/2024, which has been filed by the 1st respondent in the review petition to implement Ext.P7 order produced in the writ petition, expeditiously. The respondents 2 to 13 in the review petition are respondents 1 to 10, 12 and 13 in the writ petition. By the impugned judgment, this Court ordered Ext.P7 order to be implemented in accordance with law, at any rate, within 60 days from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment.
2. The review petitioner asserts in the review petition that, assailing Ext.P7 order, he has filed W.P(C) No.41460/2024 before this Court, which is pending consideration. By Annexure A12 order, dated 22.11.2024, this Court had recorded the submission of the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 3rd respondent in the review petition that no steps would be take
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
