Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, M.B. SNEHALATHA, JJ
K.P.RAJENDRAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellants challenge previous judgment. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. authority's decisions questioned. (Para 3) |
| 3. court's mandate for fair evaluation. (Para 4) |
| 4. court allows appeal and sets aside judgment. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 5. authority must reassess application without bias. (Para 7) |
Devan Ramachandran, J.
The appellants call into question the correctness of the judgment of a learned Single Judge of this Court, in WP(C).No.22663/2012.
2. Sri.Suraj Kumar R. – learned Counsel for the appellants, submitted that, all his clients pleaded in the Writ Petition was that the competent Authority of the Department of Revenue be directed to consider their application for Transfer of Registry of the property in question, which he had requested based on valid documents of title; but that, instead of doing so, the 4th respondent – Village Officer, issued communication making several untenable statements - including that the “Thandapper Registers” are in disarray and virtually in a stage of obliteration - but without considering the merits of his clients' application. He argued that have the appellants had no other option but to approach this Court and seek that the Village Officer be directed to ta
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
