Devan Ramachandran, J.

The appellants call into question the correctness of the judgment of a learned Single Judge of this Court, in WP(C).No.22663/2012.

2. Sri.Suraj Kumar R. – learned Counsel for the appellants, submitted that, all his clients pleaded in the Writ Petition was that the competent Authority of the Department of Revenue be directed to consider their application for Transfer of Registry of the property in question, which he had requested based on valid documents of title; but that, instead of doing so, the 4^th respondent – Village Officer, issued communication making several untenable statements - including that the “Thandapper Registers” are in disarray and virtually in a stage of obliteration - but without considering the merits of his clients' application. He argued that have the appellants had no other option but to approach this Court and seek that the Village Officer be directed to take necessary action as per the statutory scheme. He alleged that, however, without understanding the real purport of the prayer, the learned Single Judge had dismissed the Writ Petition, saying that his clients have a right to appeal against Ext.P5 before the competent Authority; ass