SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5239

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
PARAPPARA ABDU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.M.DEVESH
For the Respondents: SRI.RIJI RAJENDRAN, SMT SYLAJA S L

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner has filed this captioned writ petition seeking to challenge the revenue recovery proceedings as well as the steps for dismantling the electricity connection by the respondent – Electricity Board.

2. Sri. Riji Rajendran, the learned counsel for the Electricity Board, however, pointed out, with reference to the instructions received, that the petitioner has since settled the entire liability under the Adalath.

In view of the above, this writ petition would stand closed as infructuous.

Sd/-

HARISANKAR V. MENON JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top