Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
VINOD.V. – Appellant
Versus
JOINT REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks noc for vehicle sale amidst outstanding fines. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. arguments presented by both parties regarding noc issuance. (Para 2) |
| 3. court directs noc issuance contingent on a bank guarantee. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioner, who was the registered owner of a tipper lorry bearing registration No.KL-29-H-4788, has filed the captioned writ petition, pointing out that though the petitioner was proposing to sell the vehicle to a third party, the 1st respondent herein has not issued NOC to the vehicle in question in the light of various e-challans issued by the Motor Vehicle Department for offences detected by the said department.
2. Heard Sri.G.Hariharan, the learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as Smt.Sylaja S.L, the learned Government Pleader.
3. The petitioner is not disputing the fact that the e-challans – as many as 17 numbers – have been issued with respect to the vehicle in question. The petitioner only requires an adjudication to be carried out with respect to the e-challans issued as above. However, in the meantime, the petitioner requires the vehicle to be transferred as noticed earlier, for which NOC requires to be obtained from the 1
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
