IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
VINY VARGHESE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner was appointed as U.P.S.T w.e.f. Form
01.06.2018 in the school managed by the 3rd respondent herein. However, it is the complaint of the petitioner that her probation was not declared essentially on account of the allegation that she had not passed “45 hour Computer Course”. It is in such circumstances that the petitioner has filed the captioned writ petition, placing reliance on the Government Order at Ext.P2(a) seeking the following reliefs:
i) A direction to the third respondent to declare satisfactory completion of probation of the petiitoner w.e.f. 01.06.2019 forthwith so as to enable her to get her increments authorised without any further delay.
ii) A direction to the respondent 2 and 4 to fix the pay of the petitioner as per 2014 & 2019 pay revisions w.e.f. 01.06.2018 onwards, authorise increments, authenticate and verify the service from 01.06.2018 onwards in the service book of the petitioner forthwith.
iii) A direction to the respondents 2 and 4 to pay arrears of salary of the petitioner from 06.02.2021 to 31.10.2022 and from 01.12.2022 to 31.01.2023 forthwith.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.