IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
RENJITH SARAVANAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner is stated to be the injured/PW1 in C.C No.803 of 1997 in Crime No.149 of 97 before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II, Cherthala, wherein the 4th respondent was one of the accused. Offences under Sections 143, 147, 148, 447, 323, 324 and 326 read with Section 149 of the IPC were alleged against the 4th respondent and as per Ext.P1 judgment of the Magistrate Court dated 07.11.2002, the 4th respondent was convicted and sentenced to undergo imprisonment and fine. Though an appeal was preferred before the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track-II, Alappuzha, as Crl. Appeal No.357/2002 , the same was also dismissed, confirming the conviction and sentence. The 4th respondent then filed Crl. R.P No.221/2005 before this Court, where no stay of the conviction was granted.
2. The petitioner relies on Ext.P3 Government Order, G.O(P)
No.26/98/P&ARD dated 27.08.1998, which says that when an employee is convicted by a Criminal Court and sentenced to undergo imprisonment and/or for a payment of fine, he will be dismissed or removed from service irrespective of the fact that an appeal is pending and execution of sentence is suspended by invoking the provision
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.