IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
JOVITTA OLIVER – Appellant
Versus
CORPORATION OF COCHIN – Respondent
JUDGMENT
These writ petitions are connected and therefore, I am disposing of these judgments by a common judgment.
2. The prayers in W.P(C) No. 13039/2025 are extracted hereunder :
(I) “Issue a Writ of Mandamus or such other appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, commanding the 1st respondent to remove the unauthorized construction done by the 2nd respondent in compliance of Ext.P6, within such time fixed by this Hon’ble Court.
(II) To dispense with English translation of documents produced in vernacular language (III) Issue such other writ, appropriate Order or Direction as this Hon’ble Court deem fit to the facts and circumstances of the case.” [sic]
3. The main prayer in this writ petition is to issue direction to the 1st respondent to remove unauthorised construction done by the 2nd respondent in that case and conclude the proceedings based on Ext.P6 provisional order. The 2nd respondent in that petition filed W.P.(C.) No. 274/2026. The prayers in W.P.(C) No. 274/2026 are extracted hereunder :
a) “To issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ, order or direction calling for the records leading to the issuance of Exhibit P7 and P8 and quash the same.
b) To issue a writ of mandamus or
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.