JUDGMENT

This writ petition is filed with following prayers:

i. Call for the records leading to Ext.P.6 and set aside the same by issuing writ in the nature of certiorari;

ii. Writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the second respondent to regularise the occupancy of the petitioner and consider transferring Ext.P.1 permit in favour of the petitioner.

iii. Issue writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the 2nd respondent NOT to demolish the booth held by the petitioner in succession of her deceased brother;

iv. Declare that the petitioner is entitled to hold and have the Both sanctioned to her brother as per Ext.P.1 on priority being the widowed sister of the deceased permit holder;

v. Such other reliefs that the Hon’ble Court deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.

vi. Dispense with filing of translation of vernacular documents.

(SIC)

2. Petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P6 notice issued by the Palakkad Municipality by which the petitioner is directed to remove a Milma Booth. The case of the petitioner is that Ext.P6 is issued without giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel