IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
NITHIN.M.C. – Appellant
Versus
REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER – Respondent
JUDGMENT
This Writ Petition (C) is filed seeking the following relief:
" (i) To issue a writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, quashing Exhibit-P1, the order dated 09.07.2025 passed by Respondent No.1 rejecting the petitioners application in Form-5."
[SIC]
2. Petitioners submitted a Form-5 application in accordance with the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act , 2008. The same was rejected as per Ext.P1. The short point raised by the petitioners is that, in the same survey number, another property owner filed a Form-5 application and the same is allowed as per Ext.P2. The same is not considered while deciding the Form-5 application submitted by the petitioners is the submission.
3. Heard the Government Pleader also.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I think Ext.P1 can be set aside, and there can be a direction to reconsider the Form-5 application submitted by the petitioners in the light of Ext.P2.
Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of with the following directions:
1. Ext.P1 is set aside.
2. The 1st respondent/Authorised O directed to reconsider Form-5 application submitted by the petitioners in the light
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.