Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5279

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R. RAVI, J
SELVET SAMUEL – Appellant
Versus
B.VENUGOPALAN POTTY – Respondent
CRP NO. 148 OF 2022

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.A.SANIL KUMAR, SRI.JOHN M.GEORGE
For the Respondents: SHRI.P.RAVEENDRAN PILLAI, SRI. S. UNNIKRISHNAN, GOVT.PLEADER

The court closed the civil revision petition, confirming no further proceedings were necessary due to orders transferring cases.

Headnote:This judgment pertains to Civil Revision Petition No. 148 of 2022, where the petitioner seeks to address the order from the Sub Court, Alappuzha. The court acknowledged that, due to case transfers, no further proceedings were required. The petition was therefore closed without further resolutions.

ORDER

In view of orders that have been issued transferring the cases to one court, nothing further remains in this civil revision petition.

The civil revision petition is closed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5279

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMT.R. RAVI, JSELVET SAMUEL – AppellantVersusB.VENUGOPALAN POTTY – RespondentCRP NO. 148 OF 2022

The court closed the civil revision petition, confirming no further proceedings were necessary due to orders transferring cases.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R. RAVI, J
SELVET SAMUEL – Appellant
Versus
B.VENUGOPALAN POTTY – Respondent
CRP NO. 148 OF 2022