IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R.RAVI, J
SELVOM – Appellant
Versus
TATA TEA LTD. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The only prayer made at the time of hearing is for an early disposal of E.A. No.16 of 2025 in E.P. No.2 of 2013 in O.S. No.77 of 2002 before the Munsiff Court, Devikulam, seeking issuance of a survey commission to identify the property.
2. The counsel for the respondents submitted that the petitioners father had claimed as a licensee in the property and the suit which had been filed by the respondents based on the title had been decreed and the decree had been confirmed by the judgment in a second appeal. It is during the execution of the said decree that this original petition is filed.
3. The petitioner has a case that the property involved is different from the property which was scheduled in the suit. Since the prayer is only for disposal of EA.No.8 of 2025 in EA.No.16 of 2025 in EP.No.2 of 2013 in OS.No.77 of 2002, this original petition is disposed of directing the Munsiff Court, Devikulam to consider and pass orders on the above application, at the earliest, at any rate, within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
Sd/-
T.R.RAVI JUDGE
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.