SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5281

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R.RAVI, J
SELVOM – Appellant
Versus
TATA TEA LTD. – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.LATHEESH SEBASTIAN
For the Respondents: SRI. ABRAHAM JOSEPH MARKOS

JUDGMENT

The only prayer made at the time of hearing is for an early disposal of E.A. No.16 of 2025 in E.P. No.2 of 2013 in O.S. No.77 of 2002 before the Munsiff Court, Devikulam, seeking issuance of a survey commission to identify the property.

2. The counsel for the respondents submitted that the petitioners father had claimed as a licensee in the property and the suit which had been filed by the respondents based on the title had been decreed and the decree had been confirmed by the judgment in a second appeal. It is during the execution of the said decree that this original petition is filed.

3. The petitioner has a case that the property involved is different from the property which was scheduled in the suit. Since the prayer is only for disposal of EA.No.8 of 2025 in EA.No.16 of 2025 in EP.No.2 of 2013 in OS.No.77 of 2002, this original petition is disposed of directing the Munsiff Court, Devikulam to consider and pass orders on the above application, at the earliest, at any rate, within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

Sd/-

T.R.RAVI JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top