SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5282

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R.RAVI, J
E. RAJENDRAN – Appellant
Versus
KOZHUTHAMMAL EDICHERI VALIYA VEETTIL NARAYANI AMMA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: M.V.AMARESAN, S.S.ARAVIND

JUDGMENT

The original petition has been filed challenging the order in CMA.No.4 of 2019 passed by the Sub Court, Payyannur, whereby an order of injunction against interference with user of a way granted by the trial court was confirmed. The order was issued on 27.06.2023. The original petition was moved on 11.07.2024 and this Court was not inclined to admit or grant an interim order. The case was subsequently moved only in January, 2026. I do not find any reason to interfere with the order of the trial court at this stage. Since the suit is of 2016, the only direction that can be granted is to expedite the suit.

In the above circumstances, this original petition is disposed of directing the Munsiff Court, Payyannur to consider and disposed of OS.No.85 of 2016, at the earliest, at any rate, within six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

Sd/-

T.R.RAVI, JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top