No merit was found in claims regarding unauthorized land reclamation, as proper approvals were established.

JUDGMENT

The above writ petition is filed with the following reliefs:

1. Issue a writ of mandamus or such other writ, order or direction directing the Respondents 1 and 2 to take action as against the 7 respondent based on the Exhibit P2 issued by the Agricultural Officer and Exhibit P6 report of the 4th respondent;

2. Issue a writ of mandamus or such other writ, order or direction directing the Respondent 1 and 2 to restore the land to its original position reclaimed by the 7th respondent illegally in Re. Sy No. 48/8 of Nediyirippu Village.

3. Issue such other orders as may be just and necessary in the interest of justice.

2. The specific case of the petitioner is that the construction activity undertaken by the 7^th respondent is in the paddy land. 3. A detailed counter affidavit has been filed by the 7th respondent wherein it is stated that they have already approached the authorities filing Exts.R7(g) & R7(h)applications in Form-5, for removing the property from the data bank. The learned counsel appearing for the 7^th respondent has 19.01.2026, producing the order dated 07.10.2022 issued by the Sub-Collector, Perinthalmanna, wherein the subject property has been removed from the data bank and also the order in the Form-6 application for change of nature of land submitted by the petitioner, which has been allowed on 06.12.2024.

In the light of the above documents, I find no merit in the contention raised by the petitioner and the writ petition is accordingly dismissed.

Sd/-