Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
DR.FATHIMATH NASEEHA.M.F – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenges were made regarding jurisdictional authority of the tribunal. (Para 2 , 5 , 7 , 9 , 11) |
| 2. applicants sought remedies against non-inclusion of qualifications. (Para 3) |
| 3. court examined allegations of arbitrary non-inclusion of qualifications. (Para 4 , 6 , 8 , 10 , 19) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioners are the applicants in O.A.(EKM)No.595 of 2025 on the file of the Kerala Administrative Tribunal at Thiruvananthapuram (Additional Bench, Ernakulam), an original application filed under Section 19 of the Kerala Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 , seeking the following reliefs:
(ii) Declare that the non-inclusion of the qualification of Postgraduate Diploma in Netra Roga Vigyan (Ayurveda) for appointment to the post of Medical Officer (Netra) in the Department of Indian Systems of Medicine, in Annexure A7 Indian Systems of Medicine (Kerala) Service Amendment Special Rules, 2020, is arbitrary, discriminatory, unreasonable and hence, unconstitutional;
(iv) Call for the records leading to the issuance of Annexure A7 Indian Systems of Medicine (Kerala) Service Amendment Special Rules, 2020, and quash the same to the extent it does not include the qualification of Postgradu
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
