SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5302

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
K SIVANANDHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.LEGITH T.KOTTAKKAL, SRI.P.R.BANERJI
For the Respondents: SHRI.SANTHOSH PETER (MAMALAYIL), SRI.AMAL GEORGE, SRI.JOSEPH JERARD SAMSON RODRIGUES, CGC, SRI.UNNIKRISHNA KAIMAL

JUDGMENT

The main relief sought for by the petitioner is for disbursement of the amount covered by Ext.P2 towards procurement of paddy from the petitioner. Other contentions have also been raised regarding the claim for disbursement of the amount.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that since during the pendency of the writ petition amounts due to the petitioner under Ext.P2 have already been paid by the 2nd respondent, nothing further survives for consideration in this writ petition. It is however submitted that the questions raised in the writ petition may be left open.

In view of the above submission and having heard the respective counsel, I am satisfied that this writ petition has become infructuous.

Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous leaving open all contentions.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top