IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
VARGHESE K.J. @APPOI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dispute settled yet not resolved in practice. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. public prosecutor's assertion regarding unresolved disputes. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's rationale for dismissal of the case. (Para 5) |
ORDER
The petitioners are the accused Nos. 1 and 2 in S.C.No.166/2024 on the file of the Court of Sessions, Thodupuzha, which has originated from Crime No.17/2024, registered by the Kumily Police Station, alleging the commission of offences punishable under Sections 3 24 r/w Section 3 4 of the Indian Penal Code and (1)(r), 3(1)(s) and 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities)
Act, 1989.
2. The petitioners have filed this criminal miscellaneous case on the assertion that the dispute that led to the registration of crime has been amicably settled between the petitioners and respondents 2 and 3 on the basis of Annexure-A5 Compromise Agreement.
3. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor.
4. The learned Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submits that, respondents 2 and 3 have reported to the Investigating Officer that the disputes that led to the registration has not been settled between them. More
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.