Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
P.M.Noushad – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks to quash the fir based on not constituting an offence. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court discusses the implications of amicable settlement and inherent powers. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
ORDER
The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.429/2025 registered by the Chittar Police Station, Pathanamthitta, alleging the commission of the offence punishable under Section 303 (2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023.
2. The criminal miscellaneous case is filed to quash all further proceedings in the crime on the assertion that, even if the allegations are taken on its face value, the same would not attract the offence alleged against the petitioner.
3. When the criminal miscellaneous case came up for consideration on 15.12.2025, this Court had referred the parties to the mediation.
4. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned Public Prosecutor, and the learned Counsel for the 3rd respondent.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the 3rd respondent submit that the dispute which led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioner and the 3rd respondent as per the memorandum of set
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
