Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
N. NAGARESH, J
SAINA K.P. – Appellant
Versus
KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. legitimacy of service recognition under the settlement. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. hardship from non-consideration of representations. (Para 4) |
| 3. court's directive for timely consideration of representations. (Para 5 , 7) |
J U D G M E N T
Dated this the 27th day of January, 2026 The petitioners state that they are working as Senior Assistants / Cashier in the Kerala State Electricity Board. Petitioners 1 to 4 initially entered into service in the post of Office Attendant Grade-II with effect from 21.12.1994, 15.12.1994, 19.12.1994 and 19.12.1994 respectively, under the Compassionate Employment Scheme. Since there was no regular vacancies to appoint the petitioners, they were temporarily appointed as CLR workers. The petitioners were given increments and other service benefits with effect from the date of their appointment as CLR worker.
2. Later, audit objection was raised with respect to the payment of such benefits. The said matter was decided by a settlement in the year 2007 between the 1st respondent and its employees. As per sub-clause 23 of Clause F of Article X of the Settlement Agreement, it was agreed that the actual period of CLR service with respect to the emplo
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
