JUDGMENT

This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:

“a) Issue a writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate order or direction to quash the 2nd condition stipulated in Exhibit P4 order by the 1st respondent and to set aside the Exhibit P6 letter issued by the 2nd respondent.

b) To direct the 2nd respondent to consider and pass order on Exhibit P5 application in the light of the decision reported in Tahsildar v. Renjith George [2025 KHC OnLine 7012] and the Full Bench decision rendered by this Court in Jacob Boban v. State of Kerala [2025 KLT OnLine 1241] , within one month.

c) Direct the 2nd respondent to allow the Exhibit P5 application and to change the nature of the property covered by Exhibit P4 order as dry land in the Basic Tax Register.

d) To dispense with the filing of the translation of vernacular documents.

e) To issue such other writ order or directions which are deemed fit and proper for the interest of justice. ”

[SIC]

2. According to the petitioner, the property is covered by Ext.P4 order passed in accordance with the Kerala Land Utilization Order (for short ‘KLU Order’), and it is a converted property and removed from the data bank, pursuant to Exts.P2 and