Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
TOLINS TYRES (P) LTD – Appellant
Versus
REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition addressing conditions in the klu order. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments presented regarding the legality of the conditions. (Para 3) |
| 3. court's reliance on precedents for its decision. (Para 4) |
| 4. final directive for reconsideration of application without previously imposed conditions. (Para 5) |
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:
“a) Issue a writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate order or direction to quash the 2nd condition stipulated in Exhibit P4 order by the 1st respondent and to set aside the Exhibit P6 letter issued by the 2nd respondent.
b) To direct the 2nd respondent to consider and pass order on Exhibit P5 application in the light of the decision reported in Tahsildar v. Renjith George [2025 KHC OnLine 7012] and the Full Bench decision rendered by this Court in Jacob Boban v. State of Kerala [2025 KLT OnLine 1241] , within one month.
c) Direct the 2nd respondent to allow the Exhibit P5 application and to change the nature of the property covered by Exhibit P4 order as dry land in the Basic Tax Register.
d) To dispense with the filing of the translation of vernacular documents.
e) To issue such other writ order or dir
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
