SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5336

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V, K. V. JAYAKUMAR, JJ
DR. P.M.S. RAVEENDRANATH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WA NO. 2096 OF 2025 | WP(Crl.) NO. 767 OF 2022



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.C.S.MANU
For the Respondents: ADV. NEEMA T V, SR. PP.

The appellant may withdraw the appeal but retains the right to challenge the final report in accordance with law.

Headnote:The case concerns an appeal against the judgment dated 11.06.2025 regarding WP(Crl.) No. 767 of 2022, where a challenge was mounted against the Crime and Occurrence Report. The appellant requested permission to withdraw the appeal due to the filing of a final report, seeking liberty to contest it subsequently. The Court allowed the withdrawal, granting the appellant the liberty to challenge the final report in the future. Thus, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

Table of Content
1. judgment challenges regarding crime and occurrence report. (Para 1 , 2)
2. request for permission to withdraw and challenge final report. (Para 3 , 4)
3. the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn. (Para 5)

Raja Vijayaraghavan V, J.

This appeal is preferred challenging the judgment dated 11.06.2025 in WP(Crl.) No. 767 of 2022 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court.

2. It is seen that in the said Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenge was raised against Ext. P1 Crime and Occurrence Report in O.R. No. 3 of 2022 on the file of the Excise Range Office, Cherpulassery, Palakkad District.

3. When the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that he has received instructions to the effect that the final report has already been filed and, in view of the said development, sought permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Appeal. The learned counsel also requested that liberty be granted to the appellant to challenge the final report in accordance with law.

4. The learned Public Prosecutor submitted that, in the judgment rendered by the learned Single Judge, it was specifically observed that the investigation against the petitioner had already been completed and that the delay in filing the final report was only on account of the pendency of an interim order passed by this Court. It is further submitted that the learned Single Judge had granted liberty to the investigating officer to submit the final report before the jurisdictional court and that, in pursuance thereof, the final report has since been laid.

5. Having considered the rival submissions and taking note of the statement made by the learned counsel for the appellant that the appellant intends to challenge the final report, if so advised, we are of the view that the request for withdrawal deserves to be allowed.

Reserving the liberty of the appellant to challenge the final report, if he is so advised, this Writ Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top