SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5338

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R. RAVI, J
P.I. JALAL – Appellant
Versus
SAIDU MOHAMMED PATHUKUNJU – Respondent
CRP NO. 570 OF 2014



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.V.C.JAMES, SHRI.C.HARINDRAMOHAN NAIR
For the Respondents: SRI.ABDUL RAOOF PALLIPATH, SHRI.E.MOHAMMED SHAFI

Dismissal of a petition occurs due to lack of merit or relevance, making further proceedings unnecessary.

Headnote:The judgment concerns a civil revision petition where the respondents' counsel claimed the matter was infructuous. The Kerala High Court determined that there was no further merit in proceeding with the case and dismissed the petition. The court's conclusions were based on the submissions made by the counsel for the respondents and framed around the procedural context of the case. Ultimately, the petition was dismissed as infructuous, leading to the final outcome of the court's decision.

ORDER

When the case is taken up, it is submitted by the counsel for the respondents that the matter has become infructuous.

The civil revision petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top