SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5338

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R. RAVI, J
P.I. JALAL – Appellant
Versus
SAIDU MOHAMMED PATHUKUNJU – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.V.C.JAMES, SHRI.C.HARINDRAMOHAN NAIR
For the Respondents: SRI.ABDUL RAOOF PALLIPATH, SHRI.E.MOHAMMED SHAFI

ORDER

When the case is taken up, it is submitted by the counsel for the respondents that the matter has become infructuous.

The civil revision petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top